Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 14:14
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Yes, You Can Change Outfits In Nightreign , But Not At First - Kotaku
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What are the methods used for preserving rice straw in China?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Oakmont caddies look to fill roles during U.S. Open, on and off the bag - TribLIVE.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Enim eius molestiae qui iste impedit qui voluptatem iste.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Is it possible for the AfD to ever win the chancellorship in Germany?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?